🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Expensive

Based on a recent study, typical households spends $27,000 each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). The average employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $17,000 for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to political disagreements over subsidies which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. How medical professionals get paid changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

How Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee making moderate income must contribute about five point three percent to their healthcare. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you compare it to what the typical American pays. I can name multiple clients who are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, those payments also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. This includes both worker and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's military, IT, social programs and transportation services, the program could be managed by private contractors rather than a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complicated (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would definitely exist less liability for employers as we no longer would be privy to our employees' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that government play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It enables for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, despite increased taxation required, would still be a superior and less expensive approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

As Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality in the world, based on major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.